Performance and egg quality of Embrapa 051 laying hens subjected to different feeding programs

Autores/as

  • Suelen Nunes da Silva Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas-RS, Brazil.
  • Juliana Forgiarini Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas-RS, Brazil.
  • Débora Aline Alves Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas-RS, Brazil.
  • Everton Luis Krabbe Embrapa Swine and Poultry, Concordia-SC, Brazil
  • Valdir Silveira Avila Embrapa Swine and Poultry, Concordia-SC, Brazil
  • Débora Cristina Nichelle Lopes Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Pelotas-RS, Brazil.
  • Eduardo Gonçalves Xavier Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Pelotas-RS, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26605/medvet-v14n1-3715

Palabras clave:

external quality, internal quality, Lohmann Brown, productive performance.

Resumen

This study aimed to evaluate the productive performance and egg quality of Embrapa 051 lineage laying hens compared to a commercial line (Lohmann Brown) when subjected to different feeding programs. Trial consisted of a randomized complete block design, with four treatments: T1 - Lohmann Brown Line receiving 100% basal diet; T2 - Embrapa 051 Line receiving 93% basal diet; T3 - Embrapa 051 line receiving 100% basal diet; and T4 - Embrapa 051 lineage receiving 107% basal diet. The treatments had five replicates each. The basal diet was that recommended by the Lohmann Brown line manual. Variables of bird performance (egg weight, egg production rate, feed conversion per dozen eggs, energy conversion and egg mass) were analyzed, as well as internal egg quality (Haugh unit, yolk color, yolk percentage, and albumen percentage) and external egg quality (specific gravity, shell percentage, and shell thickness). All performance variables presented significant differences (P <0.05) in the three evaluated cycles, comparing lineages. Egg produced by the Embrapa 051 line had the highest percentages of yolk and those of the Lohmann Brown line had the highest percentage of albumen. In conclusion, Embrapa 051 lineage has the potential to produce good quality eggs, as long as it receives the same feeding program of the genetically established lineage.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Suelen Nunes da Silva, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas-RS, Brazil.

Formada em Medicina Veterinária pela Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco. Doutorado em Ciência Animal Tropical pela UFRPE. Técnica do Laboratório de Doenças Infectocontagiosas dos Animais Domésticos, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE). Atua principalmente nas áreas de microbiologia, diagnóstico sorológico, molecular e caracterização genética.

Citas

ABPA. Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal, 2016. Available: <http://abpa-br.com.br/noticia>. Acess in: 08 July. 2016.

Akbar, M.K.; Gavora, J.S.; Friars, G.W.; Gowe, R.S. Composition of eggs by commercial size categories: Effects of genetic group, age, and diet. Poultry Science, 62(6): 925-933, 1983.

Barbosa, V.M.; Baião, N.C.; Mendes, P.M.; Rocha, J.S.; Pompeu, M.A.; Lara, L.J.; Martins, N.R. S.; Nelson, D.L.; Miranda, D.J.A.; Cunha, C.E.; Cardoso, D.M.; Cardeal, P.C. Avaliação da qualidade da casca dos ovos provenientes de matrizes pesadas com diferentes idades. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 64(4): 1036-1044, 2012.

Brawner, W.R.; Hill, G.E; Sundermann, C.A. Effects of coccidial and mycoplasmal infections on carotenoid-based plumage pigmentation in male house finches. The Auk, 117(4): 952–963, 2000.

Carvalho, F.B.; Stringhini, J.H.; De Moraes Jardim Filho, R.; Leandro, N.S.M.; Café, M.B.; De Deus, H.A.S.B. Qualidade interna e da casca para ovos de poedeiras comerciais de diferentes linhagens e idades. Ciência Animal Brasileira, 8(1): 25-30, 2007.

Costa, F.G.P.; Souza, H.C.D.; Gomes, C.A.V.; Barros, L.R., Brandão, P.A.; Nascimento, G.A.J.D.; Santos, A.W.R.; Amarante Junior, V.D.S. Níveis de proteína bruta e energia metabolizável na produção e qualidade dos ovos de poedeiras da linhagem Lohmann Brown. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 28(6): 1421-1427, 2004.

Curtis, P.A.; Gardner, F.A.; Mellor, D.B.A. Comparison of Selected Quality and Compositional Characteristics of Brown and White Shell Eggs I. Shell Quality. Poultry Science, 64(2): 297-301, 1985.

Eisen, E.J.; Bohre, B.B.; Mckean, H.E. The Haugh unit as a measure of egg albumen quality. Poultry Science. 41(1): 1461-1468, 1962.

Hamilton, R.M.G. Methods and factors that affect the measurement of egg shell quality. Poultry Science, 61(10): 2022–2039, 1982.

Harms, R.H.; Russell, G.B.; Sloan, D.R. Performance of four strains of commercial layers with major changes in dietary energy. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 9(4): 535-541, 2000.

Hempe, J.K.; Lauxwn, R.C.; Savage, J.E. Rapid determination of egg weight and specific gravity using a computerized data collection system. Poultry Science, 67(6): 902-907, 1988.

Hernandez, J.M. Stable pigmenting carotenoids: a new concept for Least Cost Pigmentation. Journal Animal Feed Science and Technology, 5(6): 43-47, 2001.

Hocking, P.M.; Bain, M.; Channing, C.E.; Fleming, R.; Wilson, S. Genetic variation for egg production, egg quality and bone strength in selected and traditional breeds of laying fowl. British Poultry Science, 44(3): 365-373, 2003.

Kemps, B.J.; Govaerts, T.; De Ketelaere, B.; Mertens, K.; Bamelis, F.R.; Bain, M.M.; Decuypere, E.M.; Baerdemaeker, J.G. The influence of line and laying period on the relationship between different eggshell and membrane strength parameters. Poultry Science, 85(7): 1309-1317, 2006.

Lohmann do Brasil. Guia de manejo Lohmann Brown. São José do Rio Preto, 2011.

Mazzuco, H. Ovo: alimento funcional, perfeito à saúde. Revista Avicultura Industrial, 2: 12-16, 2008.

McLaren, K. XIII—The development of the CIE 1976 (L* a* b*) uniform colour space and colour‐difference formula. Coloration Technology, 92(9): 338-341, 1976.

Olsson, N. Studies on specific gravity of hen’s eggs. A new method for determining the percentage of shell on hen’s eggs. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz, 1934.

Poggenpoel, D.G.; Ferreira, G.F.; Hayes, J.P.; Du Preez, J.J. Response to long‐term selection for egg production in laying hens. British Poultry Science, 37(4): 743-756, 1996.

Scott, T.A.; Silversides, F.G. The effect of storage and strain of hen on egg quality. Poultry Science, 79(12): 1725-1729, 2000.

Stadelman, W.J.; Cotterill, O.J. Egg science and technology. New York: Food Products Press, 1977.

Statistix 10. Analytical software PO Box 12185; Tallahassee, 2016.

Tyczkowski, J.; Schaeffer, J. L.; Hamilton, P. B. Measurement of malabsorption of carotenoids in chickens with pale-bird syndrome. Poultry Science, 70(11): 2275-2279, 1991.

USDA (United States Departament of Agriculture). Egg grading manual, 2006. Available: <https://www.ams.usda.gov/about-ams/programs-offices/livestock-poultry-seed-program>. Acess in: 02 September. 2016.

Zumbado, M. La gravedad especifica para determinar la calidad del cascaron. Avicultura Profesional, 1(1): 8-10, 1983.

Washburn, K.E. Genetic variation in egg production. In: Crawford, R.D. (Ed.). Poultry breeding and genetics. New York: Elsevier. 1990. p.781-804.

Williams, K.C. Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh unit score. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 48(1): 5-16, 1992.

Wu, G.; Gunawardana, P.; Bryant, M.M.; Roland, D.A. Influence of dietary energy and antibiotic on performance, egg solids, and egg quality in Bovans White and Dekalb White hens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 17(3): 323-330, 2008.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-08-10

Cómo citar

Silva, S. N. da, Forgiarini, J., Alves, D. A., Krabbe, E. L., Avila, V. S., Lopes, D. C. N., & Xavier, E. G. (2020). Performance and egg quality of Embrapa 051 laying hens subjected to different feeding programs. Medicina Veterinária, 14(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.26605/medvet-v14n1-3715

Número

Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2020)

Sección

Produção Animal

Licencia

  • A Revista de Medicina Veterinária permite que o autor retenha os direitos de publicação sem restrições, utilizando para tal a licença  Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
  • De acordo com os termos seguintes:
  • Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
  • NãoComercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
  • CompartilhaIgual — Se você remixar, transformar, ou criar a partir do material, tem de distribuir as suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original.
  • Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.